Let’s Talk About Charity

To: Disability Network West Michigan Board of Directors
From: Eleanor Canter, Advocate

Do you know that people with disabilities, like me, used to be nothing more than poster children for the crusade to eradicate disability? Throughout history, we have been uninvited to the discussions about our own lives. That’s why we have a saying in our community that is very important to us: Nothing About Us Without Us. Centers for Independent Living were created – specifically – not to do charity. They were created to do advocacy. Disability Network West Michigan receives $700,000 in taxpayer money per year to do advocacy. Yet, charity is the only activity the organization involves itself with.

Charity damages our community.

DNWM Facebook Header features a picture of a walkway on a beach and reads - Have You Noticed Something Missing from Pere Marquette? GIVE TODAY

When you excuse the City from its responsibility under the ADA by choosing charity over advocacy, you endanger the efforts of every advocate. What will happen the next time an advocate tries to enforce their rights under the ADA?

Disability Network West Michigan Facebook Header

If you didn’t understand before, this is why consumer control is so important. People with disabilities make starkly different decisions for ourselves than non-disabled people make for us. Since the beginning of time, we have fought against well-meaning people, with the best of intentions, who feel that they are qualified to speak for us. 

I remind you that having a medical issue is not the same as being a person with a disability. In fact, the Independent Living Model is meant to stand in stark contrast to the Medical Model. Ableism can exist anywhere – even in our own hearts. We do not all have some type of disability when it comes to ensuring consumer control at a Center for Independent Living.

Being a person with a disability, for the purpose of consumer control, means being able to say proudly that you are a member of the disability community and advocating to advance our shared interests from that position. This isn’t about which disabilities are visible. This is about consumer-driven advocacy.

The way that I can tell that this Center for Independent Living is not consumer controlled is that it’s not behaving like a CIL. Consumer controlled CILs don’t feel threatened by the voices of advocates – they embrace them.

If our behavior seems foreign to you, that means change is needed. We are not monsters. We are Independent Living advocates. And we don’t give up – ever.

As always, we stand ready to work with you. I look forward to a renewed commitment to working together in advancement of our mutual interests.


One thought on “Let’s Talk About Charity

  1. There is a difference when I have access to a public beach because I am a citizen, a valued member of the community, and when I have access because someone took up a collection. My equality is diminished if my basic right to participate in government funded recreation is called a fund raiser.
    Why should I have to depend on my neighbor’s charity to have the same access he does?.Wait! I don’t; the Americans with Disabilities Act, 1990, Title II guaranteed my equal right to access public services. If a beach or a picnic area or a play ground is owned or operated by public funding the governmental entity must make it accessible to ALL citizens, with or without a disability. That’s me; citizen.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s